Skip to content

Epoch Capabilities Index Leaderboard

composite194 models · Updated October 2026

On the Epoch Capabilities Index benchmark, Claude Opus 5.5 ranks #1 with a score of 167, while Mistral Nemo offers the best score-per-dollar at $0.03/1M output tokens. The full ranking, with cost per million tokens, is below.

💰 Best value
Mistral Nemo — score 119 at $0.03/1M output tokens
#ModelScoreOutput / 1MContext
1Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic167$20.001M
2GPT-6 AstraOpenAI166$50.001.1M
3GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI166$10.001.1M
4Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic165$50.001M
5Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle165$10.001M
6Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic164$10.001M
7Claude Opus 5Anthropic163$25.001M
8GPT-6 SolOpenAI163$10.001.1M
9Claude Fable 5Anthropic162$50.001M
10GPT-5.5 ProOpenAI162$180.001.1M
11GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI162$20.001.1M
12GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI159$12.001.1M
13GPT-5.4 ProOpenAI159$180.001.1M
14Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic159$0.501M
15GPT-5.5OpenAI159$30.001.1M
16Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic158$25.001M
17Kimi K3MoonshotAI157$15.001M
18Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle157$3.751M
19Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle157$3.751M
20Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba157$6.001M
21GPT-5.3-CodexOpenAI157$14.00400K
22Muse Spark 1.3Meta157$4.251M
23GPT-5.4OpenAI157$15.001.1M
24Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic156$10.001M
25GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI156$1.201.1M
26Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic156$25.001M
27GPT-6 LunaOpenAI156$0.501.1M
28Grok 4.6SpaceXAI156$6.00500K
29GPT-5.2 ProOpenAI156$168.00400K
30GLM 5.3Z.ai156$4.801M
31DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek156$0.891M
32DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeepSeek155$1.911M
33Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic155$25.001M
34Muse Spark 1.2Meta155$4.251M
35Gemini-3.1-ProPoe155$12.121M
36DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423DeepSeek154$0.181M
37Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle154$9.001M
38Grok 4.7SpaceXAI154$6.00500K
39Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle154$3.751M
40Muse Spark 1.1Meta154$4.251M
41Grok 4.5SpaceXAI154$6.00500K
42Qwen3.7 MaxQwen154$4.431M
43GPT-5.2OpenAI153$14.00400K
44GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai153$0.901M
45Gemini 3 ProOpenCode153$12.001M
46Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic152$15.001M
47Muse SparkMeta AI152——
48Grok 4.20SpaceXAI152$2.502M
49GLM 5.2Z.ai152$7.001M
50Gemini 3 FlashOpenCode152$3.001M
51Qwen3.8 27BQwen152$2.201M
52Kimi K2.6MoonshotAI151$3.41262K
53GPT-5 ProOpenAI151$120.00400K
54Inkling SmallThinking Machines150$1.20524K
55Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic150$25.00200K
56GPT-5OpenAI150$10.00400K
57GLM 5.1Z.ai150$3.04205K
58Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshotAI150$3.35262K
59GPT-5.1OpenAI150$10.00400K
60GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI149$4.50400K
61InklingThinking Machines149$4.05524K
62Kimi K2.5MoonshotAI148$3.00262K
63Qwen3.6 PlusQwen147$1.951M
64o3 ProOpenAI147$80.00200K
65Qwen3.7 PlusAlibaba147$1.601M
66MiniMax M3MiniMax147$1.201M
67Mistral Large 4Mistral147$2.091M
68o3OpenAI147$8.00200K
69Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic147$15.001M
70MiniMax M2.5MiniMax147$0.95205K
71Qwen3.5 397B-A17BAlibaba147$3.60262K
72Qwen3.6 27BQwen146$3.20262K
73Grok-4Poe146$15.00256K
74Qwen3.5 PlusAlibaba146$2.401M
75GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI146$1.25400K
76DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek146$0.80164K
77Kimi K2 0711MoonshotAI146$2.30131K
78MiniMax M2.7MiniMax146$1.20205K
79GLM 5Z.ai146$3.20205K
80Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA146$2.40262K
81o4 MiniOpenAI146$4.40200K
82GPT-5 MiniOpenAI145$2.00400K
83Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)Google DeepMind145——
84Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle145$2.501M
85DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek145$0.41164K
86Qwen3.7 FlashAlibaba145$0.131M
87Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle144$1.501M
88Grok 4 FastZenMux144$0.502M
89Qwen3.6 35B-A3BAlibaba144$1.49262K
90Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic144$75.00200K
91Qwen3 235B-A22BAlibaba144$2.80131K
92GLM 4.7Z.ai144$2.20205K
93Qwen3.5 FlashAlibaba144$0.401M
94Qwen3.6 FlashQwen143$1.131M
95Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle143$2.501M
96Gemma 4 31B ITQVAC143$0.00262K
97Claude Opus 4Anthropic143$75.00200K
98Qwen3.5 35B-A3BAlibaba142$2.00262K
99GPT-5.5 InstantZenMux142$30.00400K
100Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic142$5.00200K
101Qwen3 MaxAlibaba142$6.00262K
102o1OpenAI142$60.00200K
103Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle142$0.26262K
104Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic142$15.00200K
105Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral141$7.50262K
106DeepSeek-R1Azure141$5.40164K
107Claude 3.7 SonnetHelicone141$15.00200K
108o3 MiniOpenAI140$4.40200K
109Grok 3 MiniPoe140$0.50131K
110gpt-oss-120b (batch)OpenAI140$0.14131K
111DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek140$0.95164K
112Qwen3 30B A3BQwen140$0.5041K
113Qwen3.5-9BQwen139$0.15262K
114GPT-5 NanoOpenAI139$0.40400K
115Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen139$0.55262K
116Qwen3 32BQwen138$0.28131K
117Grok 3Poe138$15.00131K
118Qwen3 14BAlibaba138$1.40131K
119gpt-oss-20b (batch)OpenAI138$0.11131K
120QwQ 32BAlibaba (China)138$0.86131K
121DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BAlibaba (China)137$0.8633K
122Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen137$0.30262K
123GPT-4.1OpenAI137$8.001M
124GPT-4.5OpenAI137——
125Qwen3 8BAlibaba136$0.70131K
126DeepSeek V3DeepSeek136$0.28164K
127o1-miniAzure136$4.40128K
128DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14BAlibaba (China)135$0.4333K
129Gemini 2.0 FlashGoogle135$0.401M
130Gemini 2.0 ProGoogle DeepMind135——
131GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI135$1.601M
132o1-previewOpenAI135——
133Mistral Medium 3Mistral134$2.00131K
134Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle134$0.401M
135Claude 3.5 SonnetDigitalOcean134$15.00200K
136Qwen 2.5 MaxNanoGPT133$6.3932K
137Llama 4 MaverickMeta132$0.651M
138Mistral Small 3.2Mistral132$0.30128K
139Gemini 1.5 ProGoogle DeepMind132——
140Magistral Small 1.2Amazon Bedrock131$1.50128K
141Grok-2xAI130——
142Phi 4Microsoft130$0.1416K
143Gemma 3 27BGoogle130$0.45131K
144Llama 4 ScoutMeta130$0.591.3M
145GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI130$0.401M
146Gemini 1.5 FlashNanoGPT129$0.312M
147GPT-4oOpenAI129$10.00128K
148Qwen2.5 72BNanoGPT129$0.41131K
149Llama 3.1-405BMeta AI129——
150Qwen2.5-32BAlibaba129——
151Mistral Large 2Mistral AI129——
152Mistral Small 3.1Azure127$0.30128K
153Llama 3.3 70BVenice AI127$2.80128K
154GPT-4 TurboOpenAI127$30.00128K
155Claude 3.5 HaikuHelicone127$4.00200K
156Mistral Small 3Mistral127$0.0833K
157Claude 3 OpusLLM Gateway127$75.00200K
158GPT-4o-miniOpenAI127$0.60128K
159Llama 3.1 70BWeights & Biases126$0.80128K
160GPT-4OpenAI126$60.008K
161Qwen2-72BAlibaba125——
162amazon--nova-proSAP AI Core124$2.13300K
163Gemma 3 12BGoogle123$0.15131K
164Llama 3-70BMeta AI123——
165Gemma 2 27BGoogle122$0.658K
166Mixtral 8x22BMistral122$6.0064K
167Mistral LargeMistral AI122$6.00128K
168Claude 3 SonnetAnthropic121——
169Claude 2Anthropic120——
170Qwen 2.5 Coder 32BAbacus120$0.79128K
171Command R (08-2024)Cohere119$0.60128K
172Claude 2.1Anthropic119——
173Mistral NemoMistral119$0.03131K
174GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI119$1.5016K
175Mixtral 8x7BMistral119$0.7032K
176Claude 3 HaikuAnthropic118$1.25200K
177Ministral 3B (latest)Mistral118$0.04131K
178Yi-34B01.AI117——
179phi-3-mini 3.8BMicrosoft117——
180Gemini 1.0 ProGoogle DeepMind117——
181Llama 3.1 8BGroq117$0.08131K
182Llama 3-8BMeta AI116——
183Gemma 3 4BGoogle116$0.10131K
184Llama 2-70BMeta AI114——
185Falcon-180BTechnology Innovation Institute112——
186LLaMA-65BMeta AI110——
187Llama 2-13BMeta AI106——
188Llama 2-34BMeta AI105——
189Falcon-40BTechnology Innovation Institute105——
190Llama-3.2-1BPioneer102$0.10131K
191LLaMA-13BMeta AI101——
192Llama 2-7BMeta AI99.2——
193LLaMA-7BMeta AI96.8——
194Qwen2.5-Coder-0.5BPioneer88.3$0.1033K

Frequently asked questions

What is the Epoch Capabilities Index benchmark?

Epoch Capabilities Index is a composite used to evaluate and rank large language models. This page lists 194 models by their Epoch Capabilities Index score.

Which model is best on Epoch Capabilities Index?

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) currently leads the Epoch Capabilities Index leaderboard with a score of 167.

What is the best value model on Epoch Capabilities Index?

Mistral Nemo offers the best score-per-dollar on Epoch Capabilities Index — a score of 119 at $0.03 per 1M output tokens.

Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Updated October 2026.