DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GLM 4.5 Air
GLM 4.5 Air is cheaper on output tokens, while GLM 4.5 Air offers a larger context window. Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or GLM 4.5 Air based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | GLM 4.5 Air |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (China) | Z.ai |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.29 | $0.13 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.86 | $0.85 |
| Context window | 33K | 131K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | — |
| Released | Jan 2025 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 64.1 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 137 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1384 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or GLM 4.5 Air cheaper?
GLM 4.5 Air is cheaper on output tokens ($0.85 vs $0.86 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or GLM 4.5 Air?
GLM 4.5 Air has the larger context window (131K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.