Qwen Long vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper on output tokens, while Qwen Long offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen Long or MiMo-V2.6-Flash based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen Long | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (China) | Xiaomi |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.07 | $0.14 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.29 | $0.28 |
| Context window | 10M | 1.1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | No | — |
| Released | Jan 2025 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1455 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1635 |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1259 |
FAQ
Is Qwen Long or MiMo-V2.6-Flash cheaper?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper on output tokens ($0.28 vs $0.29 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen Long or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Qwen Long has the larger context window (10M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.