QwQ 32B vs Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is cheaper on output tokens, while QwQ 32B offers a larger context window. Choose QwQ 32B or Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | QwQ 32B | Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (China) | Azure |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.29 | $0.20 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.86 | $0.78 |
| Context window | 131K | 128K |
| Parameters | 33B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Dec 2024 | Apr 2025 |
| Aider Polyglot score | 20.9 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1329 | 1279 |
| GPQA Diamond score | 65.3 | 51.8 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 138 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | — | 1118 |
| FrontierMath score | — | 0.0 |
FAQ
Is QwQ 32B or Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct cheaper?
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is cheaper on output tokens ($0.78 vs $0.86 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, QwQ 32B or Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct?
QwQ 32B has the larger context window (131K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.