QwQ 32B vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
QwQ 32B is cheaper on output tokens, while DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus offers a larger context window. Choose QwQ 32B or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | QwQ 32B | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (China) | DeepSeek |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.29 | $0.27 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.86 | $1.00 |
| Context window | 131K | 164K |
| Parameters | 33B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Dec 2024 | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | 20.9 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 65.3 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 138 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1329 | 1419 |
FAQ
Is QwQ 32B or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus cheaper?
QwQ 32B is cheaper on output tokens ($0.86 vs $1.00 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, QwQ 32B or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has the larger context window (164K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.