Celeris-1 Decision vs Strands Decider 2B
Celeris-1 Decision and Strands Decider 2B have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.
| Spec | Celeris-1 Decision | Strands Decider 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Celeris | Strands Agents |
| Decision Index score | — | 21.3 |
| Calibration error (ECE) | — | 0.044 |
| Median latency (p50) | — | 52 ms |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | $0.0080 | — |
| Parameters | — | 2B |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Question types | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no |
| Mechanism | Diffusion LM | Decoder LM with a decision readout |
| License | proprietary | apache-2.0 |
FAQ
Is Celeris-1 Decision or Strands Decider 2B more accurate?
At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.
Which is better calibrated, Celeris-1 Decision or Strands Decider 2B?
No calibration difference between Celeris-1 Decision and Strands Decider 2B is recorded yet.
Is Celeris-1 Decision or Strands Decider 2B cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.