ScaleDown Classify-1 vs linne-fern 1.0 (27B)
ScaleDown Classify-1 and linne-fern 1.0 (27B) have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.
| Spec | ScaleDown Classify-1 | linne-fern 1.0 (27B) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ScaleDown | MISA-AICORE |
| Decision Index score | — | 57.8 |
| Calibration error (ECE) | — | 0.079 |
| Median latency (p50) | — | 108 ms |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | $0.0080 | — |
| Parameters | — | 28B |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Question types | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no |
| Mechanism | Encoder classifier | Decoder LM with a decision readout |
| License | proprietary | apache-2.0 |
FAQ
Is ScaleDown Classify-1 or linne-fern 1.0 (27B) more accurate?
At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.
Which is better calibrated, ScaleDown Classify-1 or linne-fern 1.0 (27B)?
No calibration difference between ScaleDown Classify-1 and linne-fern 1.0 (27B) is recorded yet.
Is ScaleDown Classify-1 or linne-fern 1.0 (27B) cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.