ScaleDown Classify-1 vs Standard One 3B SH (v2)
ScaleDown Classify-1 and Standard One 3B SH (v2) have no measured difference in accuracy, calibration or cost in our data yet.
| Spec | ScaleDown Classify-1 | Standard One 3B SH (v2) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ScaleDown | Standard Thinking |
| Decision Index score | — | 39.9 |
| Calibration error (ECE) | — | 0.101 |
| Median latency (p50) | — | 76 ms |
| Cost per 1,000 decisions | $0.0080 | — |
| Parameters | — | 4B |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Question types | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no | Choice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no |
| Mechanism | Encoder classifier | Decoder LM with a decision readout |
| License | proprietary | apache-2.0 |
FAQ
Is ScaleDown Classify-1 or Standard One 3B SH (v2) more accurate?
At least one of the two has no Jev Decision Index score yet, so their accuracy cannot be compared here.
Which is better calibrated, ScaleDown Classify-1 or Standard One 3B SH (v2)?
No calibration difference between ScaleDown Classify-1 and Standard One 3B SH (v2) is recorded yet.
Is ScaleDown Classify-1 or Standard One 3B SH (v2) cheaper per 1,000 decisions?
A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.
Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.