Skip to content

Cloudflare clef-flash vs RSI-Jev v6.1 VL 27B (effort auto)

RSI-Jev v6.1 VL 27B (effort auto) is more accurate on the Jev Decision Index, Cloudflare clef-flash is better calibrated. Choose on whichever of accuracy, calibration and cost matters most for your decisions.

SpecCloudflare clef-flashRSI-Jev v6.1 VL 27B (effort auto)
ProviderCloudflareshgao
Decision Index score47.658.7
Calibration error (ECE)0.0250.077
Median latency (p50)53 ms76 ms
Cost per 1,000 decisions——
Parameters10B28B
Open weightsYesYes
Question typesChoice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / noChoice (one of N options), Score (ordered rubric), Yes / no
MechanismDecoder LM with a decision readoutDecoder LM with a decision readout
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0

FAQ

Is Cloudflare clef-flash or RSI-Jev v6.1 VL 27B (effort auto) more accurate?

RSI-Jev v6.1 VL 27B (effort auto) scores higher on the Jev Decision Index (58.7 vs 47.6).

Which is better calibrated, Cloudflare clef-flash or RSI-Jev v6.1 VL 27B (effort auto)?

Cloudflare clef-flash has the lower expected calibration error (0.025 vs 0.077), so its stated confidence is closer to how often it is right.

Is Cloudflare clef-flash or RSI-Jev v6.1 VL 27B (effort auto) cheaper per 1,000 decisions?

A hosted price is not recorded for both models; open-weight models cost the compute you run them on.

Cost per 1,000 decisions assumes 200 input tokens per decision. Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.