DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Both have similar output pricing, while DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus offers a larger context window. Choose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | — |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.27 | $0.66 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| Context window | 164K | 33K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | — | — |
| Released | — | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1419 | 1230 |
| SWE-bench Verified score | — | 47.0 |
| Aider Polyglot score | — | 16.4 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct have comparable output pricing.
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has the larger context window (164K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.