DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 3.1 70B
Both have similar output pricing, while DeepSeek V3.2 offers a larger context window. Choose DeepSeek V3.2 or Llama 3.1 70B based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 | Llama 3.1 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Weights & Biases |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.26 | $0.80 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.80 | $0.80 |
| Context window | 164K | 128K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | — | Yes |
| Released | — | Jul 2024 |
| LiveBench score | 63.1 | — |
| SWE-bench Verified score | 70.0 | — |
| Aider Polyglot score | 74.2 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual score | 59.0 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1424 | — |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1362 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 146 | 126 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek V3.2 or Llama 3.1 70B cheaper?
DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 3.1 70B have comparable output pricing.
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 or Llama 3.1 70B?
DeepSeek V3.2 has the larger context window (164K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.