Llama 4 Scout vs inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper on output tokens, while Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window. Choose Llama 4 Scout or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Llama 4 Scout | inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | SiliconFlow |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.18 | $0.14 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.59 | $0.57 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 131K |
| Parameters | 109B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 130 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1361 |
FAQ
Is Llama 4 Scout or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 cheaper?
inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0 is cheaper on output tokens ($0.57 vs $0.59 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Llama 4 Scout or inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0?
Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.