MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Both have similar output pricing, while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking offers a larger context window. Choose MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Qwen |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.15 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.20 | $1.20 |
| Context window | 205K | 262K |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | — |
| Released | Mar 2026 | — |
| LiveBench score | 65.0 | 51.0 |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1404 | 1368 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1398 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 146 | — |
FAQ
Is MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking cheaper?
MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking have comparable output pricing.
Which has the larger context window, MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.