Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max Thinking
Both have similar output pricing, while Qwen3.7 Max Thinking offers a larger context window. Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.7 Max Thinking based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.7 Max Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral | NanoGPT |
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.50 | $2.50 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $7.50 | $7.50 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | — | No |
| Released | — | May 2026 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 141 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1421 | — |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Vision Elo score | 1223 | — |
| LiveBench score | — | 75.2 |
FAQ
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.7 Max Thinking cheaper?
Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.7 Max Thinking have comparable output pricing.
Which has the larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.7 Max Thinking?
Qwen3.7 Max Thinking has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.