Skip to content

GLiClass large v3.0

KnowledgatorOpen weights

The best GLiClass checkpoint on Knowledgator's own zero-shot benchmark. Labels are prepended to the text and scored by relevance, so it needs the Jev criteria folded into each label and one hypothesis per Noul question to work.

Score is the one primitive GLiClass cannot answer: its output is relevance, not an ordered level.

typed-decisions
0.446
7/20 over baseline
Metatext suite
0.642
5/7 over baseline
ECE untuned
0.315
→ 0.093 held-out fitted
p50 per case
977 ms
four CPU cores

Specifications

Checkpoint
knowledgator/gliclass-large-v3.0
Publisher
Knowledgator
Mechanism
Label-relevance classifier
Backbone
DeBERTa-v3-large
Parameters
439M
License
Apache 2.0
Runs as
open weights, self-hosted
Library
gliclass
Primitives
Choice, Noul
Pricing
none — your compute

Metatext decisionsrank 4 of 21

Full leaderboard →
ConfigurationModeDecisionsBeats baselineECE
correct payload, no promptheadlineserial0.6425/70.250
criteria + single-hypothesis Noul (correct payload)serial0.6215/70.241
default payloadserial0.4243/70.510
criteria folded into labelsserial0.4043/70.494
Per-question accuracy — correct payload, no prompt, serial mode, 120 judgments
TaskQuestionTypeAccuracyBaselineBeats?
agent_tracesoutcomechoice0.4290.357✅
agent_tracesneeds_humannoul0.7140.714❌
customer_servicedepartmentchoice0.8500.400✅
customer_servicerefund_requestednoul0.9500.700✅
customer_servicefrustrationscore0.2000.500❌
security_incidentsseveritychoice0.6250.312✅
security_incidentsactively_exploitednoul0.7500.688✅

typed-decisionsrank 5 of 9

Full leaderboard →
Per-question accuracy — correct payload, no prompt, serial mode, 2,000 judgments
TaskQuestionTypeAccuracyBaselineBeats?
td_agent_trace_observabilityactionchoice0.3100.360❌
td_agent_trace_observabilityneeds_reviewnoul0.5600.550✅
td_agent_trace_observabilityoutcomechoice0.5100.500✅
td_agent_trace_observabilityriskscore0.3400.340❌
td_agent_trace_observabilityurgencyscore0.3500.370❌
td_customer_serviceactionchoice0.2400.520❌
td_customer_servicecategorychoice0.7300.380✅
td_customer_servicechurn_riskscore0.5600.470✅
td_customer_serviceneeds_humannoul0.3300.670❌
td_customer_serviceurgencyscore0.7400.420✅
td_invoice_processingdiscrepancy_severityscore0.1500.470❌
td_invoice_processingdispositionchoice0.4500.450❌
td_invoice_processingduplicatenoul0.1100.890❌
td_invoice_processingmatches_ordernoul0.5400.540❌
td_invoice_processingurgencyscore0.6900.510✅
td_security_incidentscredential_compromisenoul0.4000.550❌
td_security_incidentsdispositionchoice0.3300.740❌
td_security_incidentsseverityscore0.5100.490✅
td_security_incidentstrue_positivenoul0.6800.730❌
td_security_incidentsurgencyscore0.3900.500❌

Fitted temperature per primitive (fold 0, judged on fold 1): choice 7, score 1, noul 7 — ECE 0.293 → 0.093, accuracy → 0.456.

Published numbers

Reported by the authors or by third parties, on their own suites. Not comparable to the leaderboard above; attributed so you can check them.

Model cardKnowledgator

GLiClass large v3.0 model card

Measured on: 14-dataset zero-shot classification average (F1)

Zero-shot F1 average
0.719 (summary table 0.700)
Banking77 / SST-2
0.557 / 0.919

Author-reported; standard text-classification sets, not decisions.

Frequently asked questions

How does GLiClass large v3.0 compare to Jev?

On typed-decisions GLiClass large v3.0 scores 0.446 against Jev's 0.726, beating the majority baseline on 7 of 20 questions (Jev: 18/20).

Is GLiClass large v3.0 open source?

Yes. knowledgator/gliclass-large-v3.0 is released under Apache 2.0 and runs on your own hardware with the gliclass library.

Can GLiClass large v3.0 extract entities?

No. GLiClass large v3.0 answers questions about text and never returns spans; use a GLiNER-family model for extraction.

Related