Jev vs open models on multi-turn RAG routing
Measured on: 100 multi-turn RAG-routing decisions (20 conversations × 5), multilingual
- All four sub-decisions correct
- 0.0% (p50 189 ms)
Third-party, per-item logs on GitHub.
The 100+ language LAYA checkpoint on an mmBERT-base backbone. Ships with temperature [1, 1, 1], so it runs uncalibrated out of the box.
| Task | Question | Type | Accuracy | Baseline | Beats? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| agent_traces | outcome | choice | 0.143 | 0.357 | ❌ |
| agent_traces | needs_human | noul | 0.500 | 0.714 | ❌ |
| customer_service | department | choice | 0.650 | 0.400 | ✅ |
| customer_service | refund_requested | noul | 0.650 | 0.700 | ❌ |
| customer_service | frustration | score | 0.300 | 0.500 | ❌ |
| security_incidents | severity | choice | 0.375 | 0.312 | ✅ |
| security_incidents | actively_exploited | noul | 0.500 | 0.688 | ❌ |
| Task | Question | Type | Accuracy | Baseline | Beats? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| td_agent_trace_observability | action | choice | 0.060 | 0.360 | ❌ |
| td_agent_trace_observability | needs_review | noul | 0.510 | 0.550 | ❌ |
| td_agent_trace_observability | outcome | choice | 0.330 | 0.500 | ❌ |
| td_agent_trace_observability | risk | score | 0.210 | 0.340 | ❌ |
| td_agent_trace_observability | urgency | score | 0.130 | 0.370 | ❌ |
| td_customer_service | action | choice | 0.100 | 0.520 | ❌ |
| td_customer_service | category | choice | 0.730 | 0.380 | ✅ |
| td_customer_service | churn_risk | score | 0.340 | 0.470 | ❌ |
| td_customer_service | needs_human | noul | 0.530 | 0.670 | ❌ |
| td_customer_service | urgency | score | 0.380 | 0.420 | ❌ |
| td_invoice_processing | discrepancy_severity | score | 0.160 | 0.470 | ❌ |
| td_invoice_processing | disposition | choice | 0.410 | 0.450 | ❌ |
| td_invoice_processing | duplicate | noul | 0.110 | 0.890 | ❌ |
| td_invoice_processing | matches_order | noul | 0.540 | 0.540 | ❌ |
| td_invoice_processing | urgency | score | 0.330 | 0.510 | ❌ |
| td_security_incidents | credential_compromise | noul | 0.580 | 0.550 | ✅ |
| td_security_incidents | disposition | choice | 0.140 | 0.740 | ❌ |
| td_security_incidents | severity | score | 0.270 | 0.490 | ❌ |
| td_security_incidents | true_positive | noul | 0.710 | 0.730 | ❌ |
| td_security_incidents | urgency | score | 0.320 | 0.500 | ❌ |
Fitted temperature per primitive (fold 0, judged on fold 1): choice 7, score 4, noul 7 — ECE 0.347 → 0.073, accuracy → 0.329.
Reported by the authors or by third parties, on their own suites. Not comparable to the leaderboard above; attributed so you can check them.
Measured on: 100 multi-turn RAG-routing decisions (20 conversations × 5), multilingual
Third-party, per-item logs on GitHub.
Measured on: typed-decisions test split (400 cases, 2,000 decisions)
Author-reported; the Jev row is quoted as "published", not measured by them. Trained on the suite's own train split.
Measured on: MASSIVE (51 languages, 20-way), XNLI
Author-reported.
On typed-decisions LAYA multilingual scores 0.345 against Jev's 0.726, beating the majority baseline on 2 of 20 questions (Jev: 18/20).
Yes. convaiinnovations/laya-multilingual is released under Apache 2.0 and runs on your own hardware with the laya library.
No. LAYA multilingual answers questions about text and never returns spans; use a GLiNER-family model for extraction.