AlexWortega/openjev
Measured on: MMLU, ARC, GPQA-diamond, MNLI
- openjev-4B zero-shot MMLU / ARC-C / GPQA-d
- 0.472 / 0.592 / 0.273
Author-reported; Jev values were read off a chart, so no numeric Jev row.
The open-source implementation of Jev's mechanism: score each allowed answer by its log-probability under a chat LLM, then assemble the distribution. Measured here on a 0.5B backbone, so it is a scale substitution, not a like-for-like row.
| Task | Question | Type | Accuracy | Baseline | Beats? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| agent_traces | outcome | choice | 0.500 | 0.357 | ✅ |
| agent_traces | needs_human | noul | 0.286 | 0.714 | ❌ |
| customer_service | department | choice | 0.600 | 0.400 | ✅ |
| customer_service | refund_requested | noul | 0.550 | 0.700 | ❌ |
| customer_service | frustration | score | 0.300 | 0.500 | ❌ |
| security_incidents | severity | choice | 0.500 | 0.312 | ✅ |
| security_incidents | actively_exploited | noul | 0.312 | 0.688 | ❌ |
Reported by the authors or by third parties, on their own suites. Not comparable to the leaderboard above; attributed so you can check them.
Measured on: MMLU, ARC, GPQA-diamond, MNLI
Author-reported; Jev values were read off a chart, so no numeric Jev row.
On the Metatext suite OpenJEV scores 0.427 against Jev's 0.863.
Yes. Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct (bf16) via open-jev is released under Apache 2.0 and runs on your own hardware with the open-jev library.
No. OpenJEV answers questions about text and never returns spans; use a GLiNER-family model for extraction.